http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49710
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-05
19:25:19 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Thu Jan 5 19:25:14 2012
New Revision: 182919
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182919
Log:
PR middle-end/49710
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49710
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49710
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-03
17:52:04 UTC ---
Hi,
after some discussion with Zdenek, it seems that the problem is wrong
assumption in remove_path that the only loops removed are at the top of loop
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49710
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49710
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-28
19:37:38 UTC ---
OK, loop hiearchy looks as follows:
loop_0 (header = 0, latch = 1, niter = )
{
bb_2 (preds = {bb_0 }, succs = {bb_3 })
bb_6 (preds = {bb_5 }, succs =
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49710
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49710
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.6.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49710
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-12
08:54:29 UTC ---
Caused by http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=172430
but more probably this is just a dup of PR48813, which was for this testcase
latent before.
