http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53706
dcb changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment #24 from dcb
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53706
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53706
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53706
--- Comment #20 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-06-27 09:00:52 UTC ---
> --- Comment #19 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-06-27
> 06:30:05 UTC ---
> Alas, it doesn't work on i686 or x86_64: the free_alloc_pool in vt_finalize
> has
> to be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53706
--- Comment #19 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-06-27
06:30:05 UTC ---
Alas, it doesn't work on i686 or x86_64: the free_alloc_pool in vt_finalize has
to be conditional on non-NULL, because we will skip vt_emit_notes (and thus the
initializer) in some
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53706
--- Comment #18 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-06-27
05:43:33 UTC ---
I've just successfully bootstrapped a recent tree with (and without) the patch
on ia64-linux-gnu, so I'm going to regtest it and post it (with proper credit).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53706
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #17 from Alexandre
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53706
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53706
William J. Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53706
--- Comment #14 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-06-25 15:16:42 UTC ---
> --- Comment #13 from Rainer Orth 2012-06-25 14:55:41
> UTC ---
> I'm seeing SEGVs in i386-pc-solaris2.* bootstraps which a reghunt traced back
> to the same pa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53706
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #13 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53706
--- Comment #12 from Uros Bizjak 2012-06-21 15:23:51
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Patch that fixes all valgrind issues, but I have no idea if it is OK or not:
The patch doesn't pass the bootstrap.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53706
Ulrich Weigand changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53706
--- Comment #10 from Uros Bizjak 2012-06-21 07:33:34
UTC ---
Patch that fixes all valgrind issues, but I have no idea if it is OK or not:
--cut here--
Index: var-tracking.c
===
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53706
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53706
--- Comment #8 from Uros Bizjak 2012-06-21 06:55:50
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Created attachment 27648 [details]
> gcc48-pr53706.patch
>
> The attached patch fixes the problem for me. Alex, what do you think about
> it?
With this pat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53706
--- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-06-18
09:50:01 UTC ---
It's a bit surprising, but I guess it makes sense. I'd reorder the
initializers too, so that we release stuff in the reverse order of allocation.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53706
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-06-18
07:50:33 UTC ---
Created attachment 27648
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27648
gcc48-pr53706.patch
The attached patch fixes the problem for me. Alex, what do you think about it?
18 matches
Mail list logo