[Bug rtl-optimization/55278] [10/11/12/13 Regression] Botan performance regressions, other compilers generate better code than gcc

2023-03-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55278 --- Comment #32 from Andrew Pinski --- Does anyone understand the state of this bug report? Is the performance back up in recent releases?

[Bug rtl-optimization/55278] [10/11/12/13 Regression] Botan performance regressions, other compilers generate better code than gcc

2022-06-28 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55278 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|10.4|10.5 --- Comment #31 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug rtl-optimization/55278] [10/11/12/13 Regression] Botan performance regressions, other compilers generate better code than gcc

2022-06-15 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55278 --- Comment #30 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:acb1e6f43dc2bbedd1248ea61c7ab537a11fe59b commit r13-1100-gacb1e6f43dc2bbedd1248ea61c7ab537a11fe59b Author: Roger Sayle Date: Wed

[Bug rtl-optimization/55278] [10/11/12/13 Regression] Botan performance regressions, other compilers generate better code than gcc

2022-05-27 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55278 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.5 |10.4 --- Comment #29 from Richard