[Bug rtl-optimization/60763] [4.9 Regression] ICE in extract_insn starting with rev 208984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763 --- Comment #11 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to David Edelsohn from comment #10) I'm not questioning the analysis, I'm questioning the solution. Directly generating a register and jamming in the

[Bug rtl-optimization/60763] [4.9 Regression] ICE in extract_insn starting with rev 208984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug rtl-optimization/60763] [4.9 Regression] ICE in extract_insn starting with rev 208984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763 --- Comment #13 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org --- Gentlemen, I really do not understand this discussion. I used the term crude and receive a response that it is not crude, but it is dangerous. WTF? Why is anyone trying to sell the

[Bug rtl-optimization/60763] [4.9 Regression] ICE in extract_insn starting with rev 208984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763 --- Comment #14 from Michael Meissner meissner at linux dot vnet.ibm.com --- On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 03:21:13PM +, dje at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763 --- Comment #13 from David Edelsohn dje at

[Bug rtl-optimization/60763] [4.9 Regression] ICE in extract_insn starting with rev 208984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #32557|0

[Bug rtl-optimization/60763] [4.9 Regression] ICE in extract_insn starting with rev 208984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763 --- Comment #16 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment on attachment 32568 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32568 Patch with changelog and comment. Okay. Thanks for the clarification.

[Bug rtl-optimization/60763] [4.9 Regression] ICE in extract_insn starting with rev 208984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763 --- Comment #17 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- I'm just saying this for the record, and also to justify why I think the other use of simplify_gen_subreg is correct. (In reply to Michael Meissner from comment

[Bug rtl-optimization/60763] [4.9 Regression] ICE in extract_insn starting with rev 208984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763 --- Comment #18 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rsandifo Date: Tue Apr 8 17:50:45 2014 New Revision: 209223 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209223root=gccview=rev Log: gcc/ PR target/60763 *

[Bug rtl-optimization/60763] [4.9 Regression] ICE in extract_insn starting with rev 208984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/60763] [4.9 Regression] ICE in extract_insn starting with rev 208984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug rtl-optimization/60763] [4.9 Regression] ICE in extract_insn starting with rev 208984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763 --- Comment #5 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org --- I can see why the proposed patch will work, but it seems a little heavy-handed. This case isn't something that simplify_gen_subreg() should handle?

[Bug rtl-optimization/60763] [4.9 Regression] ICE in extract_insn starting with rev 208984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763 --- Comment #6 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to David Edelsohn from comment #5) I can see why the proposed patch will work, but it seems a little heavy-handed. This case isn't something that

[Bug rtl-optimization/60763] [4.9 Regression] ICE in extract_insn starting with rev 208984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #32553|0

[Bug rtl-optimization/60763] [4.9 Regression] ICE in extract_insn starting with rev 208984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763 Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||meissner at

[Bug rtl-optimization/60763] [4.9 Regression] ICE in extract_insn starting with rev 208984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763 --- Comment #9 from Pat Haugen pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #7) Created attachment 32557 [details] Updated patch that also uses op0_di for the conversion Should be equivalent to the previous

[Bug rtl-optimization/60763] [4.9 Regression] ICE in extract_insn starting with rev 208984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763 --- Comment #10 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org --- I'm not questioning the analysis, I'm questioning the solution. Directly generating a register and jamming in the REGNO in this pattern seems sort of crude. gen_rtx_REG (DImode, REGNO

[Bug rtl-optimization/60763] [4.9 Regression] ICE in extract_insn starting with rev 208984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/60763] [4.9 Regression] ICE in extract_insn starting with rev 208984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/60763] [4.9 Regression] ICE in extract_insn starting with rev 208984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug rtl-optimization/60763] [4.9 Regression] ICE in extract_insn starting with rev 208984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763 --- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 32553 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32553action=edit Patch for 60772 testcase OK, I could reproduce it with Andreas's