[Bug rtl-optimization/63577] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression]: Huge compile time and memory usage with -O and not -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63577 --- Comment #10 from Segher Boessenkool segher at gcc dot gnu.org --- Also note that doing GC during the pass will not reduce the compile time or the amount of garbage created at all, so won't fix the actual problem; it does of course make it

[Bug rtl-optimization/63577] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression]: Huge compile time and memory usage with -O and not -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63577 --- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool segher at gcc dot gnu.org --- It's not a very new regression, and it is quite risky in my opinion; I prefer to have this dealt with in stage1.

[Bug rtl-optimization/63577] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression]: Huge compile time and memory usage with -O and not -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63577 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.8.5 |6.0 --- Comment

[Bug rtl-optimization/63577] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression]: Huge compile time and memory usage with -O and not -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63577 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- It is a regression, so perhaps, depends on how risky the patch would be. Most likely it would need to be tested with always-collect params on a few larger testcases.

[Bug rtl-optimization/63577] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression]: Huge compile time and memory usage with -O and not -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63577 --- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool segher at gcc dot gnu.org --- [ I missed your last comment, sorry. ] Both the log_links and the reg_stat point to insns in the insn stream, (all of those are either live or never again referred to), so that

[Bug rtl-optimization/63577] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression]: Huge compile time and memory usage with -O and not -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63577 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug rtl-optimization/63577] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression]: Huge compile time and memory usage with -O and not -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63577 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.8.4 |4.8.5 ---

[Bug rtl-optimization/63577] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression]: Huge compile time and memory usage with -O and not -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63577 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug rtl-optimization/63577] [4.8/4.9/5? Regression]: Huge compile time and memory usage with -O and not -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63577 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-*

[Bug rtl-optimization/63577] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression]: Huge compile time and memory usage with -O and not -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63577 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.8/4.9/5? Regression]:|[4.8/4.9/5

[Bug rtl-optimization/63577] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression]: Huge compile time and memory usage with -O and not -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63577 Segher Boessenkool segher at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at