https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64156
--- Comment #5 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Wed Dec 3 13:16:25 2014
New Revision: 218312
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218312root=gccview=rev
Log:
Revert r218266
gcc/
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64156
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64156
Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64156
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64156
--- Comment #2 from Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Note, the fix proposed in PR64151 DOES NOT work on the PowerPC, so it may be a
dup in terms of what change broke the build, but the potential fix needs more
analysis.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64156
Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64156
--- Comment #3 from Wilco wdijkstr at arm dot com ---
(In reply to Michael Meissner from comment #2)
Note, the fix proposed in PR64151 DOES NOT work on the PowerPC, so it may be
a dup in terms of what change broke the build, but the potential
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64156
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Wilco from comment #3)
Anyway it looks like this patch has triggered some complex allocation
issues, so it seems best to revert it. I'll get someone to do that
