[Bug rtl-optimization/64756] [5 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in 32-bit mode)

2015-02-04 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64756 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/64756] [5 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in 32-bit mode)

2015-02-03 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64756 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Feb 3 20:41:38 2015 New Revision: 220377 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220377root=gccview=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/64756 * cse.c

[Bug rtl-optimization/64756] [5 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in 32-bit mode)

2015-02-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64756 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc

[Bug rtl-optimization/64756] [5 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in 32-bit mode)

2015-02-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64756 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 34643 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34643action=edit gcc5-pr64756.patch I'd say we just should never record volatile MEMs into the hash

[Bug rtl-optimization/64756] [5 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in 32-bit mode)

2015-02-02 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64756 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug rtl-optimization/64756] [5 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in 32-bit mode)

2015-02-01 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64756 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target