https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68189
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68189
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68189
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68189
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Mikael Pettersson from comment #6)
> Started with r208165 (on x86_64-linux with -O3).
This also only exposed the bug I believe.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68189
--- Comment #7 from Mikael Pettersson ---
(In reply to Mikael Pettersson from comment #6)
> Started with r208165 (on x86_64-linux with -O3).
And the subsequent fix in r208222 does not help for this test case.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68189
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68189
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68189
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Symptom in the asm is that %ecx is used uninitialized.
