[Bug rtl-optimization/71636] Missed optimization in variable alignment test

2016-06-26 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71636 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/71636] Missed optimization in variable alignment test

2016-06-25 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71636 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization --- Comment #2 from

[Bug rtl-optimization/71636] Missed optimization in variable alignment test

2016-06-23 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71636 --- Comment #1 from Richard Henderson --- Oh, and I meant to mention -- if the target doesn't have an andnot insn, both formulations are identical in complexity and minimal path. Which might suggest *always* performing the transformation at a