https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77541
--- Comment #8 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Fri Nov 25 17:42:21 2016
New Revision: 242881
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242881&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-11-25 Vladimir Makarov
PR rtl-optimization/77541
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77541
--- Comment #7 from Uroš Bizjak ---
The test needs
/* { dg-require-effective-target int128 } */
instead of
/* { dg-require-effective-target lp64 } */
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77541
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77541
--- Comment #5 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Thu Nov 24 19:54:27 2016
New Revision: 242848
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242848&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-11-24 Vladimir Makarov
PR rtl-optimization/77541
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77541
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #2)
> (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #1)
> > This is RA failure, where reload tries to fix up:
>
> To be clear, it is LRA pass, not reload.
Yes, it is a LRA b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77541
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77541
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77541
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77541
--- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #1)
> This is RA failure, where reload tries to fix up:
To be clear, it is LRA pass, not reload.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77541
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ra
Status|UNCONFIRMED
10 matches
Mail list logo
