https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80357
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80357
--- Comment #14 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Tue Apr 18 18:49:19 2017
New Revision: 246980
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246980&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR rtl-optimization/80357
* haifa-sched.c (tmp_bitmap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80357
--- Comment #13 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Yes exactly. When pressure is removed the reg is on the reg_use_list
eight times, but when pressure was added it was just once.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80357
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80357
--- Comment #11 from Segher Boessenkool ---
The pressure becomes quite negative here... that isn't supposed to
happen as far as I can see. Allowing all negative pressures in the
asserts makes everything compile fine, but there really shouldn't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80357
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80357
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80357
--- Comment #9 from Bill Schmidt ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8)
> (In reply to Bill Schmidt from comment #6)
> > That revision enabled -fsched-pressure by default, so it may have been
> > latent with -fsched-pressure before then.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80357
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Bill Schmidt from comment #6)
> That revision enabled -fsched-pressure by default, so it may have been
> latent with -fsched-pressure before then.
No, r243865 does not ICE with -O3 -fsched-press
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80357
--- Comment #7 from Pat Haugen ---
(In reply to Bill Schmidt from comment #6)
> That revision enabled -fsched-pressure by default, so it may have been
> latent with -fsched-pressure before then.
Yes, this is a latent bug in the "model" sched-pre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80357
--- Comment #6 from Bill Schmidt ---
That revision enabled -fsched-pressure by default, so it may have been latent
with -fsched-pressure before then.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80357
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Started with r243866.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80357
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dje at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80357
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80357
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80357
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
16 matches
Mail list logo