https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82338
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82338
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #5 from Eric Gallage
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82338
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82338
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Fri Sep 29 17:15:24 2017
New Revision: 253299
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253299&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-09-29 Vladimir Makarov
PR rtl-optimization/82338
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82338
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82338
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Thank you for reporting this, especially for reducing the test case. The bug
is not dangerous, it does not result in wrong code generation but it might
result in worse code.
I reproduced it. It seam
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82338
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
12 hours reducing leads to this C++ code:
extern "C" {
void a();
void *memset(void *, int, unsigned long);
}
struct b {
int c;
int d;
} e[5000], *f;
int g;
int h;
int i;
int j, k;
void l(int);
int m;
i
