subject:"\[Bug rtl\-optimization\/84003\] FAIL\: g\+\+.dg\/torture\/pr77745.C with noinline foo"

[Bug rtl-optimization/84003] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr77745.C with noinline foo

2018-11-20 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84003 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug rtl-optimization/84003] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr77745.C with noinline foo

2018-11-20 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84003 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Nov 20 14:47:49 2018 New Revision: 266318 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266318=gcc=rev Log: 2018-11-20 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 2018-03-12

[Bug rtl-optimization/84003] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr77745.C with noinline foo

2018-11-20 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84003 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- I'm going to backport.

[Bug rtl-optimization/84003] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr77745.C with noinline foo

2018-11-20 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84003 --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška --- Richi: Will you backport or do we close it?

[Bug rtl-optimization/84003] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr77745.C with noinline foo

2018-01-26 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84003 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||8.0 Known to fail|

[Bug rtl-optimization/84003] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr77745.C with noinline foo

2018-01-26 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84003 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Jan 26 14:50:25 2018 New Revision: 257091 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257091=gcc=rev Log: 2018-01-26 Richard Biener PR

[Bug rtl-optimization/84003] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr77745.C with noinline foo

2018-01-25 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84003 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Looks like we eventually need sth like /* If the later store we delete could have changed the dynamic type of the memory make sure the one we