[Bug rtl-optimization/89435] [7/8/9 Regression] wrong code with -O1 -march=armv4 -fno-forward-propagate with __builtin_sub_overflow()

2019-10-21 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89435 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Oct 21 11:42:37 2019 New Revision: 277251 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277251=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-09-11 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug rtl-optimization/89435] [7/8/9 Regression] wrong code with -O1 -march=armv4 -fno-forward-propagate with __builtin_sub_overflow()

2019-09-11 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89435 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Sep 11 11:37:39 2019 New Revision: 275642 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275642=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/89435 PR rtl-optimization/89795 PR

[Bug rtl-optimization/89435] [7/8/9 Regression] wrong code with -O1 -march=armv4 -fno-forward-propagate with __builtin_sub_overflow()

2019-03-28 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89435 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/89435] [7/8/9 Regression] wrong code with -O1 -march=armv4 -fno-forward-propagate with __builtin_sub_overflow()

2019-03-28 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89435 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P3 --- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou

[Bug rtl-optimization/89435] [7/8/9 Regression] wrong code with -O1 -march=armv4 -fno-forward-propagate with __builtin_sub_overflow()

2019-03-27 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89435 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/89435] [7/8/9 Regression] wrong code with -O1 -march=armv4 -fno-forward-propagate with __builtin_sub_overflow()

2019-03-25 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89435 --- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou --- *** Bug 89815 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug rtl-optimization/89435] [7/8/9 Regression] wrong code with -O1 -march=armv4 -fno-forward-propagate with __builtin_sub_overflow()

2019-02-21 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89435 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug rtl-optimization/89435] [7/8/9 Regression] wrong code with -O1 -march=armv4 -fno-forward-propagate with __builtin_sub_overflow()

2019-02-21 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89435 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- And sure, if you could look at this (or somebody from ARM otherwise), it would be highly appreciated.

[Bug rtl-optimization/89435] [7/8/9 Regression] wrong code with -O1 -march=armv4 -fno-forward-propagate with __builtin_sub_overflow()

2019-02-21 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89435 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Started with r242326. Since that version, we have before ira: (insn 28 27 36 2 (set (reg:SI 141) (const_int 255 [0xff])) "pr89435.c":9 182 {*arm_movsi_insn} (nil)) ... (insn 42 36 43 2 (set

[Bug rtl-optimization/89435] [7/8/9 Regression] wrong code with -O1 -march=armv4 -fno-forward-propagate with __builtin_sub_overflow()

2019-02-21 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89435 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug rtl-optimization/89435] [7/8/9 Regression] wrong code with -O1 -march=armv4 -fno-forward-propagate with __builtin_sub_overflow()

2019-02-21 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89435 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.5 Summary|wrong code with