[Bug rtl-optimization/96264] [10 Regression] wrong code with -Os -fno-forward-propagate -fschedule-insns -fno-tree-ter

2021-03-31 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96264 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug rtl-optimization/96264] [10 Regression] wrong code with -Os -fno-forward-propagate -fschedule-insns -fno-tree-ter

2021-03-31 Thread vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96264 --- Comment #22 from Vladimir Makarov --- I've committed the patch to gcc-10 branch. I also committed patch modifying the test -- see PR99233.

[Bug rtl-optimization/96264] [10 Regression] wrong code with -Os -fno-forward-propagate -fschedule-insns -fno-tree-ter

2021-03-31 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96264 --- Comment #21 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Vladimir Makarov : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1b7c97f25b271f826958873bda4fafc4cfc5b60d commit r10-9644-g1b7c97f25b271f826958873bda4fafc4cfc5b60d Author: Vladimir N.

[Bug rtl-optimization/96264] [10 Regression] wrong code with -Os -fno-forward-propagate -fschedule-insns -fno-tree-ter

2021-03-31 Thread tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96264 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug rtl-optimization/96264] [10 Regression] wrong code with -Os -fno-forward-propagate -fschedule-insns -fno-tree-ter

2021-03-31 Thread vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96264 --- Comment #19 from Vladimir Makarov --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #18) > Please somebody do it quick then (not omitting necessary testing, of course). I am working on it. It is my highest priority work. The patch is ready.

[Bug rtl-optimization/96264] [10 Regression] wrong code with -Os -fno-forward-propagate -fschedule-insns -fno-tree-ter

2021-03-31 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96264 --- Comment #18 from Richard Biener --- Please somebody do it quick then (not omitting necessary testing, of course).

[Bug rtl-optimization/96264] [10 Regression] wrong code with -Os -fno-forward-propagate -fschedule-insns -fno-tree-ter

2021-03-30 Thread vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96264 --- Comment #17 from Vladimir Makarov --- (In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #16) > (In reply to seurer from comment #15) > > It still fails on gcc 10, though > > Vlad, can we get this backported to GCC 10? Maybe in time for GCC 10.3?

[Bug rtl-optimization/96264] [10 Regression] wrong code with -Os -fno-forward-propagate -fschedule-insns -fno-tree-ter

2021-03-30 Thread bergner at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96264 --- Comment #16 from Peter Bergner --- (In reply to seurer from comment #15) > It still fails on gcc 10, though Vlad, can we get this backported to GCC 10? Maybe in time for GCC 10.3?