https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96475
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96475
Paweł Bylica changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chfast at gmail dot com
--- Comment #25
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96475
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96475
--- Comment #24 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Segher Boessenkool :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bab581381681813ab3ccd007195777c1f816e656
commit r11-3205-gbab581381681813ab3ccd007195777c1f816e656
Author: Segher Boessenkool
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96475
--- Comment #23 from Dimitar Dimitrov ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #20)
> Could you guys please test the attached patch? Thanks in advance!
Yes, it fixed all new regressions for pru-elf. Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96475
--- Comment #22 from Christophe Lyon ---
Yes, that fixes the build for aarch64, thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96475
--- Comment #21 from Arseny Solokha ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #20)
> Could you guys please test the attached patch? Thanks in advance!
It fixed the ICE on x86_64 I've reported in comment 17. I didn't run a regtest,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96475
--- Comment #20 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Could you guys please test the attached patch? Thanks in advance!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96475
--- Comment #19 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Created attachment 49215
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49215=edit
proposed patch for the ICEs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96475
--- Comment #18 from Segher Boessenkool ---
I have a patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96475
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96475
Dimitar Dimitrov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dinuxbg at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96475
--- Comment #15 from Alex Coplan ---
> there are similar ICEs while running the GCC testsuite for aarch64-elf
Confirmed, seeing these ICEs when running the testsuite on
aarch64-none-linux-gnu.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96475
--- Comment #14 from Christophe Lyon ---
I that's easier for you, there are similar ICEs while running the GCC testsuite
for aarch64-elf (newlib build works):
Executed from: gcc.c-torture/compile/compile.exp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96475
--- Comment #13 from Christophe Lyon ---
Created attachment 49206
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49206=edit
glibc testcase for aarch64 ICE
The vfprintf-internal.i preprocessed source from glibc-2.29 creates an ICE on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96475
--- Comment #12 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Thanks. Unfortunately it isn't saying much more (well, during which
pass this happened, pretty important ;-) )
> I can prepare the preprocessed source tomorrow if needed.
Thanks! That will make
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96475
--- Comment #11 from Christophe Lyon ---
Ha sorry I missed the beginning (interleaved in the log with other commands):
during RTL pass: sched_fusion
vfprintf-internal.c: In function '__vfprintf_internal':
vfprintf-internal.c:1702:1: internal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96475
--- Comment #10 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Please show the full message? (It starts with "internal compiler error".)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96475
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96475
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96475
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Segher Boessenkool :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:69ca5f3a988266da8905aef9cf22aa02807e0471
commit r11-3078-g69ca5f3a988266da8905aef9cf22aa02807e0471
Author: Segher Boessenkool
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96475
--- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool ---
I have a patch (since yesterday; just no time to send it :-/ )
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96475
--- Comment #5 from Mikael Pettersson ---
I can't reproduce on {ppc64le, ppc64, aarch64, m68k, x86_64}-linux-gnu, they
all inline the dispatcher at the end of each handler, w/ gcc-10.2.0 -O2.
However, for sparc64 gcc-10.2.0 -O2 does end each
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96475
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1f9ceff11132
-ftree-coalesce-vars it sounds like? But that isn't a 1-1 replacement
probably (or, what was the point of this change otherwise?)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96475
--- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #2)
> That option was removed in GCC 6, already.
Oh. Do you know if they added a replacement or just dropped the functionality
altogether?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96475
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
That option was removed in GCC 6, already.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96475
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com
---
27 matches
Mail list logo
