https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97540
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97540
--- Comment #9 from Hongtao.liu ---
Fixed in GCC11.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97540
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2e0aa43fc6ae689c595902310baec604e7e0d695
commit r11-4704-g2e0aa43fc6ae689c595902310baec604e7e0d695
Author: liuhongt
Date: Mon Oct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97540
--- Comment #7 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #5)
> The patch is posted at
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-October/557143.html
With upper patch and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97540
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||huntazhang at tencent dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97540
--- Comment #5 from Hongtao.liu ---
The patch is posted at
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-October/557143.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97540
--- Comment #4 from Hongtao.liu ---
Created attachment 49445
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49445=edit
Don't extract memory from operand for normal memory constraint.
I'm testing this patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97540
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97540
--- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu ---
2588 /* For special_memory_operand, there could be a memory operand
inside,
2589 and it would cause a mismatch for constraint_satisfied_p. */
2590 if (UNARY_P (op) && op ==
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97540
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
target?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97540
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
11 matches
Mail list logo