https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97836
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So, can this be closed as fixed or do you want to do something further?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97836
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka ---
I forgot to attach the PR number, but I commited the quick fix (to prevent
wrong code) as g:26285af40f98dfdb809b98b08386073c63b65db1
I will discuss the EAF_UNUSED flag today after teaching.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97836
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97836
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97836
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|wrong code at -O1 on|[11 Regression] wrong code