https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101744
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101744
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think this is fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101744
--- Comment #7 from Matthew Malcomson ---
Hi there,
I didn't check all the new tests that Christophe mentioned, but all those I
checked had `dg-require-effective-target hwaddress_exec` in them.
The test that determines that effective target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101744
--- Comment #6 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #5)
> > > ```
> > Just want to clarify that it's our developping lam version which is at
> > https://gitlab.com/x86-gcc/gcc/-/tree/users/intel/lam/master
>
> What can
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101744
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
> > ```
> Just want to clarify that it's our developping lam version which is at
> https://gitlab.com/x86-gcc/gcc/-/tree/users/intel/lam/master
What can you see for a vanilla GCC compiler?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101744
--- Comment #4 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #3)
> x86 also get 2 new failures
> ```
> FAIL: c-c++-common/hwasan/alloca-gets-different-tag.c -O2 -flto
> -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects execution test
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101744
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||crazylht at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101744
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matmal01 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101744
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101744
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab ---
*** Bug 101745 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
10 matches
Mail list logo
