http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55518
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55518
--- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-11-28
16:48:55 UTC ---
This seems to be sufficient for libstc++-v3...
Index: libstdc++-v3/testsuite/lib/libstdc++.exp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55518
Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55518
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-28
17:23:32 UTC ---
I still think it is a very bad idea. As I said earlier, there are lots of
similar compiler options that require their corresponding runtime libraries,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55518
--- Comment #5 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-11-28
18:23:45 UTC ---
Considering that H.J. is working towards a --with-build-config=bootstrap-asan
option, it would seem wise to allow for testing the existing FSF gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55518
--- Comment #6 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-11-28
20:18:00 UTC ---
Jakub, I've reposted the current results on x86_64-apple-darwin12 for...
make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS=--target_board=unix'{-fsanitize=address}'
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55518
--- Comment #7 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-11-28
21:02:32 UTC ---
I meant many instances in a single g=+/libstdc++-v3 testsuite failure showing
mulitple instances of ASAN:SIGSEGV.
