https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58543
--- Comment #12 from yroux at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: yroux
Date: Mon Aug 11 21:57:46 2014
New Revision: 213841
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=213841root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-08-11 Michael Collison michael.colli...@linaro.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58543
Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58543
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58543
--- Comment #10 from ygribov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ygribov
Date: Thu Oct 31 12:10:01 2013
New Revision: 204251
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204251root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-10-31 Richard Sandiford rsand...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58543
--- Comment #7 from Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com ---
Created attachment 30946
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30946action=edit
Standalone repro
Dodji,
It has just occured to me that you probably want an executable
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58543
--- Comment #6 from Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com ---
Dodji,
Let me know if I can provide additional info which may help to debug/fix this.
-Y
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58543
--- Comment #4 from dodji at seketeli dot org dodji at seketeli dot org ---
Thank you for reporting this bug.
Please find my comments below,
y.gribov at samsung dot com gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org a écrit:
Prologue seems to poison words at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58543
--- Comment #5 from Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com ---
I guess you mean *un*poison here.
Right you are!
My understanding is that in the loop above, we are setting the memory
pointed to by frame_shadow_base + { 0, 4, 8, 12, 16} to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58543
--- Comment #3 from Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com ---
Created attachment 30908
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30908action=edit
Test results
Tests seem to pass both on x86_64 and on ARM (attached).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58543
--- Comment #2 from Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com ---
I've attached a simple patch which causes compiler new register to allocate new
temp address register. I'll only be able to test it tomorrow though.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58543
--- Comment #1 from Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com ---
Created attachment 30903
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30903action=edit
Proposed patch
11 matches
Mail list logo
