[Bug sanitizer/59600] no_sanitize_address mishandled when function is inlined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59600 Yury Gribov changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0

[Bug sanitizer/59600] no_sanitize_address mishandled when function is inlined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59600 Yury Gribov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug sanitizer/59600] no_sanitize_address mishandled when function is inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59600 --- Comment #9 from ygribov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ygribov Date: Wed Feb 5 05:22:29 2014 New Revision: 207497 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207497root=gccview=rev Log: PR sanitizer/59600 gcc/ * cif-code.def

[Bug sanitizer/59600] no_sanitize_address mishandled when function is inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59600 --- Comment #10 from Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com --- Paul, does this work for you?

[Bug sanitizer/59600] no_sanitize_address mishandled when function is inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59600 --- Comment #11 from eggert at gnu dot org --- It's not easy for me to test the fix, sorry, I don't normally build GCC. If it works on the test case my guess is that it'll work for Emacs, though.

[Bug sanitizer/59600] no_sanitize_address mishandled when function is inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59600 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment on attachment 31516 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31516 New patch based on Andrew's review No this wrong in two ways. Move the check to before the check

[Bug sanitizer/59600] no_sanitize_address mishandled when function is inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59600 --- Comment #7 from Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6) Move the check to before the check of the target attribute table. My bad. And second you should compare the current function

[Bug sanitizer/59600] no_sanitize_address mishandled when function is inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59600 --- Comment #8 from Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com --- Created attachment 31522 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31522action=edit Patch which inlines based on caller/callee attribute match (In reply to Yury Gribov from

[Bug sanitizer/59600] no_sanitize_address mishandled when function is inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59600 Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||y.gribov at

[Bug sanitizer/59600] no_sanitize_address mishandled when function is inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59600 --- Comment #2 from Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org --- We had this problem in clang before http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revisionrevision=187967

[Bug sanitizer/59600] no_sanitize_address mishandled when function is inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59600 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Yury Gribov from comment #1) Created attachment 31515 [details] Draft patch Why can't you just set DECL_UNINLINABLE on the function decl in

[Bug sanitizer/59600] no_sanitize_address mishandled when function is inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59600 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) (In reply to Yury Gribov from comment #1) Created attachment 31515 [details] Draft patch Why can't you just set DECL_UNINLINABLE

[Bug sanitizer/59600] no_sanitize_address mishandled when function is inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59600 Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #31515|0 |1 is