[Bug sanitizer/64078] FAIL: c-c++-common/ubsan/object-size-9.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64078 --- Comment #16 from Tom de Vries --- Author: vries Date: Mon Aug 29 07:57:16 2016 New Revision: 239816 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239816=gcc=rev Log: 2016-08-29 Tom de Vries backport from trunk:

[Bug sanitizer/64078] FAIL: c-c++-common/ubsan/object-size-9.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64078 --- Comment #14 from Bernd Edlinger --- Author: edlinger Date: Thu Sep 17 19:43:00 2015 New Revision: 227886 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227886=gcc=rev Log: 2015-09-17 Bernd Edlinger PR

[Bug sanitizer/64078] FAIL: c-c++-common/ubsan/object-size-9.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64078 Bernd Edlinger changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/64078] FAIL: c-c++-common/ubsan/object-size-9.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64078 --- Comment #13 from Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de --- Created attachment 35747 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35747action=edit Proposed Fix that's what I think should fix the sporadic fall-out on both test

[Bug sanitizer/64078] FAIL: c-c++-common/ubsan/object-size-9.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64078 --- Comment #12 from Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de --- The same could happen also with object-size-10.c: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2015-04/msg01293.html FAIL: c-c++-common/ubsan/object-size-10.c -O2 execution

[Bug sanitizer/64078] FAIL: c-c++-common/ubsan/object-size-9.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64078 --- Comment #10 from Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de --- Hmmm, the other issue is this: g++ -g -O2 -fsanitize=undefined object-size-9.c ./a.out object-size-9.c:21:11: runtime error: load of address 0x7fffaad34acc with

[Bug sanitizer/64078] FAIL: c-c++-common/ubsan/object-size-9.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64078 --- Comment #9 from Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de --- this should avoid the random 'memory cannot be printed' issue: Index: object-size-9.c === --- object-size-9.c

[Bug sanitizer/64078] FAIL: c-c++-common/ubsan/object-size-9.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64078 --- Comment #11 from Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de --- I don't know if that is a bug or not. I see that -fpic does not inline f2 and f3. The two messages seem to be always missing when not inlined... So, how about this:

[Bug sanitizer/64078] FAIL: c-c++-common/ubsan/object-size-9.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64078 --- Comment #8 from Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de --- (In reply to vries from comment #7) Created attachment 35215 [details] relevant bit of gcc.log Next time I encounter it, I'll try to post the full FAIL message I ran

[Bug sanitizer/64078] FAIL: c-c++-common/ubsan/object-size-9.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64078 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/64078] FAIL: c-c++-common/ubsan/object-size-9.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64078 --- Comment #7 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 35215 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35215action=edit relevant bit of gcc.log Next time I encounter it, I'll try to post the full FAIL message I ran into

[Bug sanitizer/64078] FAIL: c-c++-common/ubsan/object-size-9.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64078 --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #4) I have never seen these test cases fail in my tests. But how do you start the test that it uses all the different combinations of -fpic

[Bug sanitizer/64078] FAIL: c-c++-common/ubsan/object-size-9.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64078 Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug sanitizer/64078] FAIL: c-c++-common/ubsan/object-size-9.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64078 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- The padding of struct on the same target should not change randomly though.

[Bug sanitizer/64078] FAIL: c-c++-common/ubsan/object-size-9.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64078 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- I also saw FAIL: c-c++-common/ubsan/object-size-10.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects execution test at random on Linux/ia32.

[Bug sanitizer/64078] FAIL: c-c++-common/ubsan/object-size-9.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64078 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at