https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64354
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rogero at howzatt dot co.uk
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64354
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.0 |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64354
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64354
--- Comment #3 from Dmitry Vyukov ---
Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64354
--- Comment #2 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Thu May 19 12:05:59 2016
New Revision: 236457
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236457&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-05-19 Maxim Ostapenko
PR sanitizer/64354
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64354
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry Vyukov ---
We've hit this issue while implementing Go support for C++ ThreadSanitizer:
https://github.com/golang/go/issues/14602
__has_feature obviously does not work. Providing __SANITIZE_THREAD__ looks very
reasonable