https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64820
--- Comment #9 from Maxim Ostapenko ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Tue Dec 8 11:34:28 2015
New Revision: 231405
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231405=gcc=rev
Log:
2015-12-08 Maxim Ostapenko
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64820
--- Comment #10 from Maxim Ostapenko ---
Should be fixed on gcc-4_9-branch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64820
joakim.tjernlund at transmode dot se
changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64820
--- Comment #7 from Maxim Ostapenko ---
(In reply to joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se from comment #6)
> Is this fix in gcc 4.9.3?
No, this didn't go to GCC 4.9, only to GCC 5.
> If not, will go into 4.9.4?
Well, actually we didn't plan backport
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64820
--- Comment #8 from joakim.tjernlund at transmode dot se ---
As stack protector is default in gcc, I don't think it is specific.
I did bite me on ppc with only -fsanitize=address and
ASAN_OPTIONS=detect_stack_use_after_return=1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64820
--- Comment #4 from Maxim Ostapenko chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fixed by r22145.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64820
Maxim Ostapenko chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64820
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64820
--- Comment #2 from Maxim Ostapenko chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Mon Mar 16 11:17:32 2015
New Revision: 221457
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221457root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-03-16 Max Ostapenko
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64820
Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||y.gribov at
10 matches
Mail list logo