https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78532
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aaro.koskinen at iki dot fi
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78532
--- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Thu Jun 29 18:57:47 2017
New Revision: 249808
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249808=gcc=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2017-01-10 James Clarke
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78532
--- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Thu Jun 29 18:26:45 2017
New Revision: 249807
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249807=gcc=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2017-01-10 James Clarke
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78532
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78532
--- Comment #9 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Wed Nov 30 12:32:55 2016
New Revision: 243016
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243016=gcc=rev
Log:
Add PR sanitizer/78532 patch to libsanitizer/LOCAL_PATCHES.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78532
--- Comment #8 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Wed Nov 30 12:31:07 2016
New Revision: 243014
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243014=gcc=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/78532
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78532
--- Comment #7 from Maxim Ostapenko ---
Created attachment 40197
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40197=edit
Fix
Right.
Attached patch fixes build error (perhaps all sparc stuff should go upstream,
because I think we
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78532
--- Comment #6 from Maxim Ostapenko ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #5)
> On Tue, 29 Nov 2016, m.ostapenko at samsung dot com wrote:
>
> > /home/max/src/glibc/resolv/ns_print.c:99: undefined reference to
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78532
--- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Tue, 29 Nov 2016, m.ostapenko at samsung dot com wrote:
> /home/max/src/glibc/resolv/ns_print.c:99: undefined reference to
> `__stack_chk_guard'
You get this if glibc and GCC have
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78532
--- Comment #4 from Matthias Klose ---
using the glibc build from Debian unstable, build logs at
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=glibc
see https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=glibc=sparc64
for the last successful build.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78532
--- Comment #3 from Maxim Ostapenko ---
(In reply to Matthias Klose from comment #2)
> glibc 2.24 and linux 4.8.7.
Could you also share how you configure Glibc? Do you use native or cross build?
I'm asking because Glibc 2.24 fails to build for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78532
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose ---
glibc 2.24 and linux 4.8.7.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78532
Maxim Ostapenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m.ostapenko at samsung dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78532
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
14 matches
Mail list logo
