https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79993
--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Apr 3 21:15:36 2017
New Revision: 246662
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246662=gcc=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/79993 - ICE with VLA initialization from string
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79993
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|jakub at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79993
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79993
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nils at os dot
inf.tu-dresden.de
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79993
--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor ---
I think it would be preferable to make VLA initialization work the way it was
supposed to. A patch to handle it properly exists (bug 69517) and I plan
(hope) to dust it off for GCC 8 and submit it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79993
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> Created attachment 41072 [details]
> gcc7-pr79993.patch
>
> So, one option is to revert to the 4.8 and earlier behavior, disallow any
> VLA initialization (like
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79993
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 41072
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41072=edit
gcc7-pr79993.patch
So, one option is to revert to the 4.8 and earlier behavior, disallow any VLA
initialization (like
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79993
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79993
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79993
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.5
Summary|ICE in
10 matches
Mail list logo
