[Bug target/100152] [10/11/12 Regression] used caller-saved register not preserved across a call.

2021-07-20 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152 --- Comment #56 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:383295aaada04b02b733ab6b9e069dfb020d47b3 commit r11-8784-g383295aaada04b02b733ab6b9e069dfb020d47b3 Author: Iain Sandoe

[Bug target/100152] [10/11/12 Regression] used caller-saved register not preserved across a call.

2021-07-09 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152 --- Comment #55 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:41bd1b190358fce213f5add8396faf14a32d5c23 commit r12-2226-g41bd1b190358fce213f5add8396faf14a32d5c23 Author: Iain Sandoe Date:

[Bug target/100152] [10/11/12 Regression] used caller-saved register not preserved across a call.

2021-05-14 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|8.5 |10.4 CC|

[Bug target/100152] [10/11/12 Regression] used caller-saved register not preserved across a call.

2021-05-12 Thread lucier at math dot purdue.edu via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152 --- Comment #54 from lucier at math dot purdue.edu --- After an update to Fink's dejagnu, I got similar results.

[Bug target/100152] [10/11/12 Regression] used caller-saved register not preserved across a call.

2021-05-11 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152 --- Comment #53 from Iain Sandoe --- on macOS 10.15 (Darwin19) with r12-637-g56103737 comparing unpatched / patched. -WARNING: 29_atomics/atomic_float/wait_notify.cc execution test program timed out. -FAIL:

[Bug target/100152] [10/11/12 Regression] used caller-saved register not preserved across a call.

2021-05-09 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152 --- Comment #52 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to lucier from comment #51) > /Users/lucier/programs/gcc/gcc-mainline/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/29_atomics/ > atomic_integral/wait_notify.cc -std=gnu++2a -pthread > -fdiagnostics-plain-output

[Bug target/100152] [10/11/12 Regression] used caller-saved register not preserved across a call.

2021-05-09 Thread lucier at math dot purdue.edu via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152 --- Comment #51 from lucier at math dot purdue.edu --- I'm running fink: i expect 5.45-206Tool for automatic interactive applications i dejagnu 1.6.1-1 Framework for testing other programs i tcltk 1:8.6.10-2

[Bug target/100152] [10/11/12 Regression] used caller-saved register not preserved across a call.

2021-05-09 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152 --- Comment #50 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to lucier from comment #49) > > > Running > > > /Users/lucier/programs/gcc/gcc-mainline/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/libstdc++-dg/ > > > conformance.exp ... > > > WARNING: program timed out. > > > >

[Bug target/100152] [10/11/12 Regression] used caller-saved register not preserved across a call.

2021-05-09 Thread lucier at math dot purdue.edu via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152 --- Comment #49 from lucier at math dot purdue.edu --- > > and "make; make -k check". > > Which, presumably, succeeded [repeatably?] (also presumably with some > failing tests, since we don't have a clean testsuite on macOS). It gave

[Bug target/100152] [10/11/12 Regression] used caller-saved register not preserved across a call.

2021-05-09 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152 --- Comment #48 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to lucier from comment #47) > I downloaded > [Bradleys-Mac-mini:~/programs/gcc/gcc-mainline] lucier% git log -1 --oneline > 2254b3233b5 (HEAD -> master, origin/trunk, origin/master, origin/HEAD)

[Bug target/100152] [10/11/12 Regression] used caller-saved register not preserved across a call.

2021-05-08 Thread lucier at math dot purdue.edu via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152 --- Comment #47 from lucier at math dot purdue.edu --- I downloaded [Bradleys-Mac-mini:~/programs/gcc/gcc-mainline] lucier% git log -1 --oneline 2254b3233b5 (HEAD -> master, origin/trunk, origin/master, origin/HEAD) PR middle-end/100325 -

[Bug target/100152] [10/11/12 Regression] used caller-saved register not preserved across a call.

2021-05-03 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152 --- Comment #46 from Iain Sandoe --- Created attachment 50737 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50737=edit trial patch for testing looking at the way other ports handle things like use of registers in veneers etc. it seems

[Bug target/100152] [10/11/12 Regression] used caller-saved register not preserved across a call.

2021-05-02 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152 --- Comment #45 from Iain Sandoe --- the i386 backend code already sets : TARGET_CALL_FUSAGE_CONTAINS_NON_CALLEE_CLOBBERS to true unconditionally. So, it seems that it might be necessary to find some way to adjust CALL_INSN_FUNCTION_USAGE.

[Bug target/100152] [10/11/12 Regression] used caller-saved register not preserved across a call.

2021-04-24 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152 --- Comment #44 from Iain Sandoe --- unfortunately, wider testing showed sanitiser fails - so this has been reverted for now.

[Bug target/100152] [10/11/12 Regression] used caller-saved register not preserved across a call.

2021-04-24 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152 --- Comment #43 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b6600392bf71c4a9785f8f49948b611425896830 commit r12-103-gb6600392bf71c4a9785f8f49948b611425896830 Author: Iain Sandoe Date:

[Bug target/100152] [10/11/12 Regression] used caller-saved register not preserved across a call.

2021-04-24 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|10.4|8.5 --- Comment #42 from Iain Sandoe

[Bug target/100152] [10/11/12 Regression] used caller-saved register not preserved across a call.

2021-04-23 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152 --- Comment #41 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #40) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #39) > > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #38) > > > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #37) > > > > Oh,

[Bug target/100152] [10/11/12 Regression] used caller-saved register not preserved across a call.

2021-04-23 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152 --- Comment #40 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #39) > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #38) > > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #37) > > > Oh, and FYI a cc1 cross from x86_64 to

[Bug target/100152] [10/11/12 Regression] used caller-saved register not preserved across a call.

2021-04-23 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152 --- Comment #39 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #38) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #37) > > Oh, and FYI a cc1 cross from x86_64 to x86_64-apple-darwin19.6.0 doesn't > > seem > > to reproduce the issue

[Bug target/100152] [10/11/12 Regression] used caller-saved register not preserved across a call.

2021-04-23 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152 --- Comment #38 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #37) > Oh, and FYI a cc1 cross from x86_64 to x86_64-apple-darwin19.6.0 doesn't seem > to reproduce the issue with the reduced testcase (I seee no call to >

[Bug target/100152] [10/11/12 Regression] used caller-saved register not preserved across a call.

2021-04-23 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152 --- Comment #37 from Richard Biener --- Oh, and FYI a cc1 cross from x86_64 to x86_64-apple-darwin19.6.0 doesn't seem to reproduce the issue with the reduced testcase (I seee no call to ___UTF_8_put remaining with -O3 -fPIC -fno-strict-aliasing

[Bug target/100152] [10/11/12 Regression] used caller-saved register not preserved across a call.

2021-04-23 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152 --- Comment #36 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #35) > Which means another possible candidate for the "bug" is darwin_binds_local_p yeah... see below. > > > .. but something similar must apply to PLT and targets

[Bug target/100152] [10/11/12 Regression] used caller-saved register not preserved across a call.

2021-04-23 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152 --- Comment #35 from Richard Biener --- Which means another possible candidate for the "bug" is darwin_binds_local_p

[Bug target/100152] [10/11/12 Regression] used caller-saved register not preserved across a call.

2021-04-23 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152 --- Comment #34 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #33) > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #32) > > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #31) > > > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #30) > > > > (In

[Bug target/100152] [10/11/12 Regression] used caller-saved register not preserved across a call.

2021-04-23 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/100152] [10/11/12 Regression] used caller-saved register not preserved across a call.

2021-04-23 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152 --- Comment #32 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #31) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #30) > > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #29) > > > what is also somewhat peculiar is that replacing the first

[Bug target/100152] [10/11/12 Regression] used caller-saved register not preserved across a call.

2021-04-23 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152 --- Comment #31 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #30) > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #29) > > what is also somewhat peculiar is that replacing the first function in the > > reduced test case with "extern

[Bug target/100152] [10/11/12 Regression] used caller-saved register not preserved across a call.

2021-04-23 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Summary|[10.3, 11, 12