https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100736
Jiu Fu Guo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pheeck at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100736
--- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool ---
There are so many things here, it's hard to start. Two big things:
Firstly, this is not floating point at all, so -ffinite-math-only should not
make any difference. We currently abuse CCFP (in a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100736
--- Comment #5 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #3)
> Send patches to gcc-patches@, please. Or is there a question? Ask that
> question then, please :-)
Segher, do you have an answer for Hao Chen's question
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100736
--- Comment #4 from HaoChen Gui ---
Yes, there is a question. With my patch, the test case generates following
assembly. Seems they have the same latency (cror vs. crnot). I wonder why we
need reverse the CR bit comparison when finite-math-only
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100736
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Send patches to gcc-patches@, please. Or is there a question? Ask that
question then, please :-)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100736
HaoChen Gui changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100736
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-06-03
