[Bug target/100808] PPC: ISA 3.1 builtin documentation

2022-02-04 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100808 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/100808] PPC: ISA 3.1 builtin documentation

2022-02-04 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100808 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by William Schmidt : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8cb748a31cd8c7ac9c88b6abc38ce077dd462a7a commit r12-7060-g8cb748a31cd8c7ac9c88b6abc38ce077dd462a7a Author: Bill Schmidt Date:

[Bug target/100808] PPC: ISA 3.1 builtin documentation

2022-02-04 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100808 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/100808] PPC: ISA 3.1 builtin documentation

2021-06-02 Thread jens.seifert at de dot ibm.com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100808 --- Comment #3 from Jens Seifert --- - Avoid additional "int" unsigned long long int => unsigned long long Why? Those are exactly the same types! Yes, but the rest of the documentation uses unsigned long long. This is just for consistency

[Bug target/100808] PPC: ISA 3.1 builtin documentation

2021-06-02 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100808 --- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to Jens Seifert from comment #0) > - Avoid additional "int" unsigned long long int => unsigned long long Why? Those are exactly the same types! > - add missing line breaks between builtins