https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101363
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101363
--- Comment #8 from Christophe Lyon ---
Here are the options I see in gcc.log:
-O0 -march=armv8.2-a+bf16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101363
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:06357071d0557c4f0e9b0a6dfc4d37f5680e34cc
commit r12-2100-g06357071d0557c4f0e9b0a6dfc4d37f5680e34cc
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101363
--- Comment #6 from Tamar Christina ---
yeah, the ICEs don't make sense to me either, let me see if I can debug one of
them.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101363
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor ---
No, you didn't. I missed the one %K in aarch64.c. Let me commit the fix below
to fix the bootstrap error. I'm still not sure what the deal is with the tests
though.
diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101363
--- Comment #4 from Christophe Lyon ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #2)
> I don't see the ICE with my cross-compiler and the stack trace doesn't
> correspond to the latest sources (there's no call to error() at
> gcc/config/aarch64/aa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101363
--- Comment #3 from Tamar Christina ---
Bootstrap turns on -Werror so the warning generated in
gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c at aarch64_simd_lane_bounds for the use of `%K`
becomes fatal.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101363
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
I don't see the ICE with my cross-compiler and the stack trace doesn't
correspond to the latest sources (there's no call to error() at
gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-builtins.c:1588; a call to error_at() that rep
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101363
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
