https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103515
--- Comment #6 from Kewen Lin ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #5)
> (In reply to CVS Commits from comment #4)
> > The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
>
> Kewen, can we mark this as FIXED?
Sorry, no. The issue isn't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103515
--- Comment #5 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to CVS Commits from comment #4)
> The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
Kewen, can we mark this as FIXED?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103515
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:01ad8c54fdca1db3d71bf6c4b861a9d1db3c2a59
commit r12-5920-g01ad8c54fdca1db3d71bf6c4b861a9d1db3c2a59
Author: Kewen Lin
Date: Sun Dec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103515
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103515
--- Comment #2 from Kewen Lin ---
Here I assumed that the current cl optimization/option save and restore scheme
wants to keep the global_option/global_option_set same as the one from the
initial option processing. After we parsing all
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103515
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103515
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc
--- Comment #1 from Kewen Lin ---