https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103661
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103661
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Martin Liska
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a2af3581cba0e7fa662bd8bed7e3b90451ef6a94
commit r10-10341-ga2af3581cba0e7fa662bd8bed7e3b90451ef6a94
Author: Martin Liska
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103661
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Martin Liska
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:43d67e5e75627ad1f5ba2e983a730f37547ba9b7
commit r11-9394-g43d67e5e75627ad1f5ba2e983a730f37547ba9b7
Author: Martin Liska
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103661
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103661
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103661
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:127c7178d5ec502d95862fd823537cbca1a0cb99
commit r12-5993-g127c7178d5ec502d95862fd823537cbca1a0cb99
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103661
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103661
--- Comment #4 from Stefan Kneifel ---
Created attachment 51978
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51978&action=edit
Testcase
Without the proposed patch, it compiles to:
:
0: 50
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103661
--- Comment #3 from Stefan Kneifel ---
Created attachment 51975
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51975&action=edit
First try of a patch, making it unsigned (and correcting the resolver
generator)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103661
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103661
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Oh it does say positive integer:
This function returns a positive integer if the run-time CPU supports feature
and returns 0 otherwise.
11 matches
Mail list logo