https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103743
Jiu Fu Guo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103743
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jiu Fu Guo :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1060cd2ad00b5174f4f8ef8ca3d8c283e321ffca
commit r13-4803-g1060cd2ad00b5174f4f8ef8ca3d8c283e321ffca
Author: Jiufu Guo
Date: Tue Dec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103743
--- Comment #6 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
Drafted a patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-May/594702.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103743
--- Comment #5 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
It would be also ok for the constant that only has 16bits in the middle:
e.g. 0x09876000ULL, we can rotate the constant to 0x9876.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103743
Jiu Fu Guo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |guojiufu at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103743
Jiu Fu Guo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||guojiufu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103743
--- Comment #2 from pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #1)
> Pat, does the patch from Alan you're working to get committed help with this
> test case?
No, it just loads the constant slightly different:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103743
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103743
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
