https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104015
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104015
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fc6cd798c07a94d6b0bcc16b175e6e5d6e594c7e
commit r12-6717-gfc6cd798c07a94d6b0bcc16b175e6e5d6e594c7e
Author: Kewen Lin
Date: Tue Jan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104015
--- Comment #11 from Kewen Lin ---
(In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #10)
> Checking the number of tries might be useful, but if so, I think
> it should be done by a test that was written for that specific
> purpose. The tst can
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104015
--- Comment #10 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
(In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #9)
> I totally agree this test case can be fragile when facing different
> vectorisation strategies, but I'm not sure if leaving the exact number
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104015
--- Comment #9 from Kewen Lin ---
(In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #6)
> I think the patch in comment 2 is the correct fix (OK to commit).
>
Thanks for the review and approval Richard!
I totally agree this test case can be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104015
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6d51a9c6447bace21f860e70aed13c6cd90971bd
commit r12-6582-g6d51a9c6447bace21f860e70aed13c6cd90971bd
Author: Kewen Lin
Date: Fri Jan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104015
--- Comment #7 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Yeah I'm with Richard on this one, I just checked and the generated assembly is
the same for before and after my patch, so this looks like a testism.
And yeah I agree, if we were to decide to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104015
--- Comment #6 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
I think the patch in comment 2 is the correct fix (OK to commit).
(In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #4)
> (In reply to avieira from comment #3)
> > Hi Kewen,
> >
> > Thanks for the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104015
--- Comment #5 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Thanks Kewen, that seems worrying, I'll have a look.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104015
--- Comment #4 from Kewen Lin ---
Hi Andre,
Thanks for the detailed explanations all below!
(In reply to avieira from comment #3)
> Hi Kewen,
>
> Thanks for the analysis. The param_vect_partial_vector_usage suggestion
> seems valid, but that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104015
--- Comment #3 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hi Kewen,
Thanks for the analysis. The param_vect_partial_vector_usage suggestion seems
valid, but that shouldn't be the root cause.
I would expect an unpredicated V8HI epilogue to fail for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104015
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104015
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104015
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
14 matches
Mail list logo
