[Bug target/104780] [nvptx, sm_30] FAIL: gcc.dg/loop-unswitch-4.c execution test

2022-03-05 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104780 --- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > So if you file a bug there Done: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28945

[Bug target/104780] [nvptx, sm_30] FAIL: gcc.dg/loop-unswitch-4.c execution test

2022-03-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104780 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |MOVED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/104780] [nvptx, sm_30] FAIL: gcc.dg/loop-unswitch-4.c execution test

2022-03-04 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104780 --- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #1) > This looks like a bug in newlib/libc/machine/nvptx/calloc.c: > ... > void * > calloc (size_t size, size_t len) > { >void *p = malloc (size * len); >if

[Bug target/104780] [nvptx, sm_30] FAIL: gcc.dg/loop-unswitch-4.c execution test

2022-03-04 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104780 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org ---