https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106017
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.0, 11.0, 12.0, 13.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106017
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Peter Bergner
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3927bd9f9150576f2905c8930732c419f1850fca
commit r10-10966-g3927bd9f9150576f2905c8930732c419f1850fca
Author: Peter
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106017
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Peter Bergner
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f494a85f0bf653c3128b376c1abf821a27748c11
commit r11-10227-gf494a85f0bf653c3128b376c1abf821a27748c11
Author: Peter
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106017
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Peter Bergner
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:22ff125247ff5328ad4544aef939d491618d714d
commit r12-8726-g22ff125247ff5328ad4544aef939d491618d714d
Author: Peter Bergner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106017
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Peter Bergner :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1ae1325f24cea1698b56e4299d95446a1f7b90a2
commit r13-2239-g1ae1325f24cea1698b56e4299d95446a1f7b90a2
Author: Peter Bergner
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106017
--- Comment #9 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #7)
> I think we just want to remove the entire section in
> rs6000_invalid_conversion() that checks the XOmode/OOmode pointer
> conversions. Doing that fixes the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106017
--- Comment #8 from Peter Bergner ---
*** Bug 106015 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106017
--- Comment #7 from Peter Bergner ---
I think we just want to remove the entire section in
rs6000_invalid_conversion() that checks the XOmode/OOmode pointer conversions.
Doing that fixes the ICE and fixes the PR106015 ICE too. I'm doing a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106017
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106017
--- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool ---
FWIW, reinterpret_cast allows exactly the same things as C casts (but with the
obvious C++ extensions: member objects, member functions, C++'s concept of
lvalue, that kins of thing). It is not similar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106017
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |segher at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106017
--- Comment #4 from Nemanja Ivanovic ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #2)
> (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #1)
> > So the restriction in rs6000_invalid_conversion errors for valid C programs.
> > What was it intended to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106017
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #2)
> We do not want or allow automatic conversions between the opaque
> __vector_pair and __vector_quad types and other types and those are
> correctly
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106017
--- Comment #2 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #1)
> So the restriction in rs6000_invalid_conversion errors for valid C programs.
> What was it intended to accomplish?
We do not want or allow automatic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106017
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
15 matches
Mail list logo
