https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110217
--- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
At least CLI / SBI won't glitch at O0, same for ATOMIC_BLOCK.
For SBI et al. you are right, they rely on insn combine. The right approach
would have been compiler built-ins or API using inline asm. But
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110217
--- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
At least CLI / SBI won't glitch at O0, same for ATOMIC_BLOCK.
For SBI et al. you are right, they rely on insn combine. The right approach
would have been compiler built-ins or API using inline asm. But
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110217
--- Comment #2 from mx682x at gmail dot com ---
I see, thank you for you input.
> Apart from that, the proposed patch won't work for indirect addressing, or
> when the compiler is turning direct addresses to indirect addresses (using
> CSE etc,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110217
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #1 from
