[Bug target/112103] [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/rlwinm-0.c fails after r14-4941-gd1bb9569d70304

2024-02-20 Thread bergner at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112103 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug target/112103] [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/rlwinm-0.c fails after r14-4941-gd1bb9569d70304

2024-02-20 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112103 --- Comment #8 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Peter Bergner : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:81e5f276c59897077ffe38202849c93e9c580c41 commit r14-9085-g81e5f276c59897077ffe38202849c93e9c580c41 Author: Peter Bergner Date:

[Bug target/112103] [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/rlwinm-0.c fails after r14-4941-gd1bb9569d70304

2024-02-19 Thread bergner at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112103 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma

[Bug target/112103] [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/rlwinm-0.c fails after r14-4941-gd1bb9569d70304

2024-02-19 Thread bergner at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112103 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |bergner at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/112103] [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/rlwinm-0.c fails after r14-4941-gd1bb9569d70304

2024-02-19 Thread bergner at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112103 --- Comment #5 from Peter Bergner --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4) > So, let's just adjust the testcase then? We still want to remove the superfluous instruction, but that should be covered in a separate bug. So yeah, I think

[Bug target/112103] [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/rlwinm-0.c fails after r14-4941-gd1bb9569d70304

2024-02-16 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112103 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/112103] [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/rlwinm-0.c fails after r14-4941-gd1bb9569d70304

2024-01-19 Thread bergner at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112103 --- Comment #3 from Peter Bergner --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #2) > In all those cases the code is perfectly fine, but also in all of those > cases the > code is still suboptimal: the rldicl is just as superfluous as the

[Bug target/112103] [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/rlwinm-0.c fails after r14-4941-gd1bb9569d70304

2024-01-15 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112103 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug target/112103] [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/rlwinm-0.c fails after r14-4941-gd1bb9569d70304

2023-11-09 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112103 --- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool --- In all those cases the code is perfectly fine, but also in all of those cases the code is still suboptimal: the rldicl is just as superfluous as the second rlwinm was! :-)

[Bug target/112103] [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/rlwinm-0.c fails after r14-4941-gd1bb9569d70304

2023-11-09 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112103 --- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool --- Those are: $ diff -up rlwinm-0.s{.12,} --- rlwinm-0.s.12 2023-11-09 18:28:49.362639203 + +++ rlwinm-0.s 2023-11-09 18:30:46.422896735 + @@ -6747,7 +6747,7 @@ f_1_16_31: .LFB345:

[Bug target/112103] [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/rlwinm-0.c fails after r14-4941-gd1bb9569d70304

2023-10-27 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112103 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0

[Bug target/112103] [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/rlwinm-0.c fails after r14-4941-gd1bb9569d70304

2023-10-26 Thread roger at nextmovesoftware dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112103 Roger Sayle changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED