https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117599
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b55277a4f8543f52c6d1664bb05e8eb90f46aaf3
commit r16-3563-gb55277a4f8543f52c6d1664bb05e8eb90f46aaf3
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117599
--- Comment #12 from Yang Yujie ---
Correction: The regression was caused by r16-3036-ga76a032354ee48. :P
Now I am running tests on this patch. Will post if it's OK.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117599
--- Comment #11 from Yang Yujie ---
Sorry for only testing with --enable-checking=release.
Here's a patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117599
--- Comment #10 from Yang Yujie ---
Created attachment 62147
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62147&action=edit
Fix for r16-3056 regression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117599
--- Comment #7 from Xi Ruoyao ---
(In reply to chenglulu from comment #6)
> (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #4)
> > We have things like
> >
> > # VUSE <.MEM_74>
> > _48 = VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR(b575[i_6])[8];
> > ./gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117599
--- Comment #9 from Xi Ruoyao ---
We have
_48;
but
_48 = VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR(b575[i_6])[8];
_49 = (unsigned long) _48;
Thus a signedness mismatch between _48 and the type of
VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR(b575[i_6])[8] triggers this.
OTOH x86 has things
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117599
--- Comment #8 from chenglulu ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #7)
> (In reply to chenglulu from comment #6)
> > (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #4)
> > > We have things like
> > >
> > > # VUSE <.MEM_74>
> > > _48 = VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117599
--- Comment #6 from chenglulu ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #4)
> We have things like
>
> # VUSE <.MEM_74>
> _48 = VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR(b575[i_6])[8];
> ./gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/bitint-12.c:39:1: error: type mismatch in
> 'array_re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117599
--- Comment #5 from chenglulu ---
Jenkins automatic test, submit r16-3176 new FAIL items only the following
three:
+FAIL: gcc.dg/fixed-point/bitint-1.c (test for errors, line 8)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/fixed-point/bitint-1.c (test for errors, line 9)
+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117599
--- Comment #4 from Xi Ruoyao ---
We have things like
# VUSE <.MEM_74>
_48 = VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR(b575[i_6])[8];
./gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/bitint-12.c:39:1: error: type mismatch in
'array_ref'
where b575[i_6] is _BitInt(575). On x86 we hav
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117599
--- Comment #3 from Xi Ruoyao ---
Test failures at r16-3265 about bitint:
FAIL: gcc.dg/fixed-point/bitint-1.c (test for errors, line 8)
FAIL: gcc.dg/fixed-point/bitint-1.c (test for errors, line 9)
FAIL: gcc.dg/fixed-point/bitint-1.c (test fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117599
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by LuluCheng :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8079e96eb767851e8e061a13ecfb21aa1a2362de
commit r16-3176-g8079e96eb767851e8e061a13ecfb21aa1a2362de
Author: Yang Yujie
Date: Sat Aug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117599
--- Comment #1 from chenglulu ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #0)
> The ABI needs to be defined:
> https://github.com/loongson/la-abi-specs/issues/13.
Thank you very much, we're already researching it now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117599
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-11-16
Ever confirmed|0
14 matches
Mail list logo
