[Bug target/14563] [3.3/3.4/4.0 Regression] new/delete much slower than malloc/free because of sjlj exceptions

2004-11-10 Thread giovannibajo at libero dot it
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-11-10 08:21 --- Ron, can you please attach your testcase that shows the problem to this PR? This PR is a regression on cygwin because the speed is back with 3.2. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/14563] [3.3/3.4/4.0 Regression] new/delete much slower than malloc/free because of sjlj exceptions

2004-11-10 Thread giovannibajo at libero dot it
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-11-10 08:21 --- *** Bug 18414 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14563

[Bug target/14563] [3.3/3.4/4.0 Regression] new/delete much slower than malloc/free because of sjlj exceptions

2004-11-10 Thread dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Additional Comments From dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net 2004-11-10 09:10 --- No its not a regression. GCC-3.2 built with sjlj shows the same problem. The fast version of GCC-3.2 that OP referenced was a cygming-special that had Dwarf-2 EH enabled. As I indicated