--- Comment #12 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-09 23:27 ---
The code generated on trunk, 4.4 and 4.3 with arm-eabi-gcc at O2 for the test
in Comment #0 is
int_handler:
@ Interrupt Service Routine.
@ args = 0, pretend = 0, frame = 0
@ frame_needed = 0
--- Comment #11 from sgh at sgh dot dk 2009-02-12 21:58 ---
Since this is not marked to be fixes I assume is hasn't been fixed in 4.3.3.
Wat is wrong with Pauls patch since it hasn't been included ?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16634
--- Comment #10 from mmz at gmx dot net 2008-02-07 13:54 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> is this bug still present in 4.2.2?
I can confirm this bug still exists in 4.2.2 and 4.2.3.
> Acc. to my obervations the error only shows up when not all auto variables can
> be mapped to registers,
--- Comment #9 from ralf dot guetlein at web dot de 2007-11-08 21:42
---
(In reply to comment #8)
> also fails on 4.2.1
is this bug still present in 4.2.2?
Acc. to my obervations the error only shows up when not all auto variables can
be mapped to registers, and additional variables a
--- Comment #8 from sgh at sgh dot dk 2007-08-06 09:08 ---
also fails on 4.2.1
--
sgh at sgh dot dk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
--- Comment #7 from david+gcc at porkrind dot org 2007-05-03 03:14 ---
This still fails in gcc 4.1.2 under certain conditions. I can provide a test
case if necessary.
--
david+gcc at porkrind dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #6 from pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-04 00:09 ---
Subject: Bug 16634
Author: pbrook
Date: Thu Jan 4 00:09:48 2007
New Revision: 120413
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=120413
Log:
2007-01-03 Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR target/
--- Comment #5 from tla at thrane dot com 2006-11-14 16:28 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> What's the status of this patch?
The bug is also present in arm-elf-gcc version 4.1.0
However, adding the -fno-omit-frame-pointer parameter, make
the compiler emit the correct code in the mentioned
--- Comment #4 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-09-11 11:31 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Patch here:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-08/msg00230.html
What's the status of this patch?
--
tbm at cyrius dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-11 10:41
---
*** Bug 29004 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-08 23:47 ---
Patch here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-08/msg00230.html
--
pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #1 from pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-08 23:05 ---
*** Bug 25428 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--
What|Removed |Added
GCC host triplet|i686-pc-cygwin |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16634
13 matches
Mail list logo