--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-12
21:15 ---
Subject: Bug 17778
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-12 21:15:24
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog
gcc/config/i386:
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-12
21:27 ---
Subject: Bug 17778
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-3_4-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-12 21:26:55
Modified files:
gcc:
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-12 21:29
---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
--
What|Removed |Added
Summary|regression in evaluating|[3.4/4.0 Regression]
|long double hexadecimal |regression in evaluating
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-12 03:04
---
Try that.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Additional Comments From das at FreeBSD dot ORG 2004-11-12 03:54
---
Subject: Re: [3.4/4.0 Regression] regression in evaluating long double
hexadecimal constants
Yes, this appears to fix the problem. Thanks!
Your timing is impeccable, by the way. Over in FreeBSDland, this
bug
