--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-24
22:23 ---
Subject: Bug 18010
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-3_4-rhl-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-24 22:22:29
Modified files:
gcc:
--- Additional Comments From davidm at hpl dot hp dot com 2004-11-04 18:06 ---
(In reply to comment #18)
On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 02:24, davidm at hpl dot hp dot com wrote:
# of unexpected failures115
This is a lot more failures than we should have. I didn't have any luck
in
--- Additional Comments From wilson at tuliptree dot org 2004-10-29 22:00 ---
Subject: Re: bad unwind info due to multiple returns
(missing epilogue)
On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 02:24, davidm at hpl dot hp dot com wrote:
# of unexpected failures115
This is a lot more
--- Additional Comments From davidm at hpl dot hp dot com 2004-10-28 09:24 ---
(In reply to comment #16)
Perhaps I should have read your message closer. I get timeouts for this
testcase also. However, it bootstraps fine, and the total number of
unexpected gcc failures is only 45,
--- Additional Comments From davidm at hpl dot hp dot com 2004-10-27 11:04 ---
(In reply to comment #11)
Subject: Re: bad unwind info due to multiple returns
(missing epilogue)
On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 01:49, davidm at hpl dot hp dot com wrote:
The compiler seemed to get stuck
--- Additional Comments From wilson at tuliptree dot org 2004-10-27 19:50 ---
Subject: Re: bad unwind info due to multiple returns
(missing epilogue)
On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 04:05, davidm at hpl dot hp dot com wrote:
This was on a Debian/unstable system. How do you run
--- Additional Comments From wilson at tuliptree dot org 2004-10-28 01:16 ---
Subject: Re: bad unwind info due to multiple returns
(missing epilogue)
On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 04:05, davidm at hpl dot hp dot com wrote:
Command: /home/davidm/src/gcc/gcc/cc1 -quiet -iprefix
--- Additional Comments From davidm at hpl dot hp dot com 2004-10-26 08:49 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
You didn't say what kind of problems you ran into with gcc mainline.
The compiler seemed to get stuck in an apparent endless loop. make check
quickly resulted in timeout failures
--- Additional Comments From wilson at tuliptree dot org 2004-10-27 01:29 ---
Subject: Re: bad unwind info due to multiple returns
(missing epilogue)
On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 01:49, davidm at hpl dot hp dot com wrote:
The compiler seemed to get stuck in an apparent endless loop.
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 01:36
---
Subject: Bug 18010
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-27 01:36:12
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog emit-rtl.c
Log message:
--- Additional Comments From wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 01:48
---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From wilson at tuliptree dot org 2004-10-25 23:54 ---
Subject: Re: bad unwind info due to multiple returns
(missing epilogue)
On Fri, 2004-10-22 at 03:57, davidm at hpl dot hp dot com wrote:
It looks to
me as if expect sometimes fails to notice the
--- Additional Comments From wilson at tuliptree dot org 2004-10-26 00:06 ---
Subject: Re: bad unwind info due to multiple returns
(missing epilogue)
On Thu, 2004-10-21 at 11:03, davidm at hpl dot hp dot com wrote:
OK, I tried this patch on the CVS gcc-3_4_branch (the 4.0
--- Additional Comments From davidm at hpl dot hp dot com 2004-10-22 10:57 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Argh, I reran make check-g++ with the original (unpatched) GCC and am now
seeing 3 unexpected failures (when the exact same compiler produced 0 failures
yesterday). From what I can
--- Additional Comments From davidm at hpl dot hp dot com 2004-10-21 18:03 ---
OK, I tried this patch on the CVS gcc-3_4_branch (the 4.0 branch didn't work at
all for me, even in it's pristine version). As you said, the patch does fix the
bug I reported. In addition, the test-suites
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-21 18:07
---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Additional Comments From davidm at hpl dot hp dot com 2004-10-19 18:08 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Subject: Re: New: bad unwind info due to multiple
returns (missing epilogue)
On Fri, 2004-10-15 at 04:14, davidm at hpl dot hp dot com wrote:
To fix this bug, GCC should be
--- Additional Comments From wilson at specifixinc dot com 2004-10-19 01:07
---
Subject: Re: New: bad unwind info due to multiple
returns (missing epilogue)
On Fri, 2004-10-15 at 04:14, davidm at hpl dot hp dot com wrote:
To fix this bug, GCC should be emitting a .restore sp
--- Additional Comments From davidm at hpl dot hp dot com 2004-10-15 11:15 ---
Created an attachment (id=7356)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7356action=view)
test-ptrace-misc.c
Test case.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18010
19 matches
Mail list logo
