[Bug target/18910] [4.0 Regression] unrecognisable insn in regclass on x86/amd64

--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-05 20:31 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug target/18910] [4.0 Regression] unrecognisable insn in regclass on x86/amd64

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-05 20:29 --- Subject: Bug 18910 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-05 20:29:06 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog gcc/config/i386: i

[Bug target/18910] [4.0 Regression] unrecognisable insn in regclass on x86/amd64

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-02 16:04 --- Patch here: . -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/18910] [4.0 Regression] unrecognisable insn in regclass on x86/amd64

--- Additional Comments From jh at suse dot cz 2005-01-02 00:14 --- Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] unrecognisable insn in regclass on x86/amd64 > > --- Additional Comments From jh at suse dot cz 2005-01-01 23:52 --- > Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] unrecognisable insn in regcla

[Bug target/18910] [4.0 Regression] unrecognisable insn in regclass on x86/amd64

--- Additional Comments From jh at suse dot cz 2005-01-01 23:52 --- Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] unrecognisable insn in regclass on x86/amd64 > > --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-01 > 22:33 --- > (In reply to comment #21) > > This is the or

[Bug target/18910] [4.0 Regression] unrecognisable insn in regclass on x86/amd64

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-01 22:33 --- (In reply to comment #21) > This is the original thread which leads to this regession: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2004-11/threads.html#00839 If you notice this works on all other targets other than x86/

[Bug target/18910] [4.0 Regression] unrecognisable insn in regclass on x86/amd64

--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-01-01 22:21 --- This is the original thread which leads to this regession: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2004-11/threads.html#00839 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18910

[Bug target/18910] [4.0 Regression] unrecognisable insn in regclass on x86/amd64

--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-01-01 22:16 --- I believe that the regression is caused by http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2004-11/msg01166.html -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug target/18910] [4.0 Regression] unrecognisable insn in regclass on x86/amd64

--- Additional Comments From aj at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-01 06:36 --- Raise priority since this hits glibc. -- What|Removed |Added Priority|P2

[Bug target/18910] [4.0 Regression] unrecognisable insn in regclass on x86/amd64

--- Additional Comments From gschafer at zip dot com dot au 2005-01-01 01:18 --- I've just hit this while trying to build Glibc with current GCC trunk. It's a showstopper. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/18910] [4.0 Regression] unrecognisable insn in regclass on x86/amd64

--- Additional Comments From aj at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-17 08:01 --- *** Bug 19029 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/18910] [4.0 Regression] unrecognisable insn in regclass on x86/amd64

--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2004-12-15 20:08 --- Something is very strange: [EMAIL PROTECTED] thread]$ cat do.c extern __thread void *foo []; void test1 (void) { int s; for (s = 0; s < 2; ++s) { foo [s] = &foo[s]; } } [EMAIL PROTECTED] thread]$ /ex

[Bug target/18910] [4.0 Regression] unrecognisable insn in regclass on x86/amd64

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-14 23:35 --- *** Bug 19000 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/18910] [4.0 Regression] unrecognisable insn in regclass on x86/amd64

--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-13 08:33 --- If it's a target bug, let's pester Honza with it :-) -- What|Removed |Added C

[Bug target/18910] [4.0 Regression] unrecognisable insn in regclass on x86/amd64

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-12 21:24 --- (In reply to comment #12) > (In reply to comment #9) > > The fail dates from comment #3 probably refer to this change > What this tells me it is a latent bug in x86/x86_64 back-end as my change > should no

[Bug target/18910] [4.0 Regression] unrecognisable insn in regclass on x86/amd64

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-10 14:18 --- (In reply to comment #9) > The fail dates from comment #3 probably refer to this change > > 2004-10-17 Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

[Bug target/18910] [4.0 Regression] unrecognisable insn in regclass on x86/amd64

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-10 14:14 --- Note the date for C++ is different: : Search converges between 2004-08-30-trunk (#529) and 2004-08-31-trunk (#530). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18910

[Bug target/18910] [4.0 Regression] unrecognisable insn in regclass on x86/amd64

--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-10 12:04 --- GCC 3.3.5 (SUSE 9.2) produces this RTL for the ICEing statement: (insn 11 10 12 (nil) (set (reg:DI 61) (symbol_ref:DI ("foo"))) -1 (nil) (nil))

[Bug target/18910] [4.0 Regression] unrecognisable insn in regclass on x86/amd64

--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-10 11:52 --- The fail dates from comment #3 probably refer to this change 2004-10-17 Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * c-typeck

[Bug target/18910] [4.0 Regression] unrecognisable insn in regclass on x86/amd64

--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-10 11:47 --- Without __thread, insn 9 is almost identical except for the flags (this is with -m32 fwiw): ;; D.1123 = &foo[1] (insn 9 7 0 (set (reg:SI 58 [ D.1123 ]) -(const:SI (plus:SI (symbol_ref:SI ("foo") [f

[Bug target/18910] [4.0 Regression] unrecognisable insn in regclass on x86/amd64

--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-10 11:44 --- Minimal test case: $ cat t.c static __thread void *foo[2]; test1 () { void **ivtmp12; while (&foo[1] != ivtmp12); } $ ../cc1 t.c -fdump-rtl-expand-details test1 t.c: In function 'test1': t.c:6: error:

[Bug target/18910] [4.0 Regression] unrecognisable insn in regclass on x86/amd64

--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-10 11:35 --- Not the same but maybe related: 1 static __thread void *foo [2]; 2 3 test1 () 4 { 5 void **D, **ivtmp12; 6 L0

[Bug target/18910] [4.0 Regression] unrecognisable insn in regclass on x86/amd64

--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-10 11:18 --- Backtrace from amd64 (Prescott) at -O0 #0 fancy_abort (file=0x95711e "../../mainline/gcc/recog.c", line=2020, function=0x957139 "extract_insn") at diagnostic.c:556 #1 0x00766d08 in _fatal_insn