--- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-04-10 18:44
---
Subject: Re: [PR target/20126, RFC] loop DEST_ADDR biv replacement may fail
Roger Sayle wrote:
> On 9 Apr 2005, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
>>On Apr 8, 2005, Roger Sayle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>++
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10
04:01 ---
Subject: Bug 20126
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-10 04:00:54
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog loop.c recog.c recog.h
--- Additional Comments From roger at eyesopen dot com 2005-04-10 03:18
---
Subject: Re: [PR target/20126, RFC] loop DEST_ADDR biv replacement may fail
On 9 Apr 2005, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Apr 8, 2005, Roger Sayle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > ++ /* If there isn't a volat
--- Additional Comments From aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10
02:43 ---
Subject: Re: [PR target/20126, RFC] loop DEST_ADDR biv replacement may fail
On Apr 8, 2005, Roger Sayle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ++ /* If there isn't a volatile MEM, there's nothing we can do. */
--- Additional Comments From aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-08
20:51 ---
Subject: Re: [PR target/20126, RFC] loop DEST_ADDR biv replacement may fail
On Apr 8, 2005, Roger Sayle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ahh, I now see the misunderstanding; you changed/fixed the other
> "safe
--- Additional Comments From roger at eyesopen dot com 2005-04-08 17:03
---
Subject: Re: [PR target/20126, RFC] loop DEST_ADDR biv replacement may fail
Hi Alex,
On 8 Apr 2005, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> Roger suggested some changes in the patch. I've finally completed
> bootstrap and t
--- Additional Comments From aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-08
16:34 ---
Subject: Re: [PR target/20126, RFC] loop DEST_ADDR biv replacement may fail
On Mar 11, 2005, Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mar 10, 2005, Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> + ?
--- Additional Comments From roger at eyesopen dot com 2005-04-05 04:22
---
The stricter version is mostly OK, except for one correction and one suggestion.
The correction is that in the case where the replacement wasn't a register, you
shouldn't be calling validate_change_maybe_volatile
--- Additional Comments From aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-02
17:22 ---
Subject: Re: [PR target/20126, RFC] loop DEST_ADDR biv replacement may fail
On Mar 11, 2005, Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mar 10, 2005, Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> + ?
--- Additional Comments From aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-11
14:29 ---
Subject: Re: [PR target/20126, RFC] loop DEST_ADDR biv replacement may fail
On Mar 10, 2005, Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> + ??? Should this should search new for new volatile MEMs and reje
--- Additional Comments From aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-10
11:44 ---
Subject: Re: [PR target/20126, RFC] loop DEST_ADDR biv replacement may fail
On Mar 9, 2005, Jakub Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 01:02:08AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> On
--- Additional Comments From jakub at redhat dot com 2005-03-09 09:23
---
Subject: Re: [PR target/20126, RFC] loop DEST_ADDR biv replacement may fail
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 01:02:08AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Mar 8, 2005, Jakub Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Unfor
--- Additional Comments From jakub at redhat dot com 2005-03-09 08:51
---
Subject: Re: [PR target/20126, RFC] loop DEST_ADDR biv replacement may fail
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 01:02:08AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Mar 8, 2005, Jakub Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Unfor
--- Additional Comments From aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-09
04:02 ---
Subject: Re: [PR target/20126, RFC] loop DEST_ADDR biv replacement may fail
On Mar 8, 2005, Jakub Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unfortunately, it seems to break ada bootstrap on at least x86-64 and
--- Additional Comments From jakub at redhat dot com 2005-03-09 01:47
---
Subject: Re: [PR target/20126, RFC] loop DEST_ADDR biv replacement may fail
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 06:56:19PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> loop attempts to eliminate a biv represented by a pseudo in favor of a
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-07
21:57 ---
Subject: [PR target/20126, RFC] loop DEST_ADDR biv replacement may fail
loop attempts to eliminate a biv represented by a pseudo in favor of a
giv represented by (plus (reg) (const_int -1)). Unfortunately,
--- Additional Comments From aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-03
07:07 ---
Doh, nevermind, too many open tabs, I guess :-(
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20126
--- Additional Comments From aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-03
07:04 ---
Oops, didn't mean to pick this one up, at least for now.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20126
19 matches
Mail list logo
