--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-21 20:24 ---
Fixed for 3.4.3 as reported in comment #4.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From berndtrog at yahoo dot com 2005-04-30 17:23
---
I can confirm this bug for 3.4.2, but not for 3.4.3 and later(4_0, HEAD).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20808
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||ericw at evcohs dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20808
--
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |target
GCC target triplet||avr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20808
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20808
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-07
08:46 ---
Make sure that you attach the preprocessed source as requested by
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20808
--- Additional Comments From shubham_jain at da-iict dot org 2005-04-07
08:46 ---
Created an attachment (id=8552)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8552action=view)
The source code with a simple for loop causing the error.
A simple for loop when removed removes the
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-07
08:51 ---
Of course, the stack size is just huge (well huge for avr really).
Though with 4.0.0 and above, we remove these arrays as they are unused though
if you used them,
there will be still a bug.
Anyways this
