--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21041
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-06
17:02 ---
Postponed until 4.0.2.
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.1
--- Additional Comments From uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-06
15:57 ---
Here's another reduced test case, this time without
uninitialized variables:
// ICEs with -O2 -fPIC
struct args
{
short int matrix[8][8];
char **current;
};
int test (struct args *args, char *init, i
--- Additional Comments From matz at suse dot de 2005-06-03 14:56 ---
There are some maybe-uninitialized vars warnings. But if I fix them by
zeroing the vars it still ICEs. I can't find other uninitialized vars.
It might be, that there are uninitialized struct members, but they
shoul
--- Additional Comments From uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-16
15:48 ---
The problem originates in find_reloads_subreg_address, which decides
to widen access to a memory reference. The instruction we have is:
(insn 129 127 130 10 (parallel [
(set (reg:SI 106)
--- Additional Comments From belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru
2005-04-15 10:21 ---
// smaller testcase, compile with -O2 -fPIC
struct vs {
int h, w, k, q;
short int dct_recon[8];
};
void bar (struct vs* v)
{
char *s;
short int *b;
int x, y, z, r, i, j;
for (i = 0;
