--- Comment #12 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-11-16
00:13 ---
The gcc.target/i386/pr22076.c test case fails for i686-apple-darwin9 at -m64 as
follows...
Executing on host:
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc44-4.3.999-20081115/darwin_objdir/gcc/xgcc
--- Comment #13 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-11-16
00:14 ---
Created an attachment (id=16692)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16692action=view)
assembly file generated for gcc.target/i386/pr22076.c at -m64 on
i686-apple-darwin9
--
--- Comment #11 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-03-08 07:23 ---
Fixed for real.
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #9 from uros at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-23 15:24 ---
Subject: Bug 22076
Author: uros
Date: Sat Feb 23 15:24:02 2008
New Revision: 132572
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=132572
Log:
PR target/22076
PR target/34256
*
--- Comment #10 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-02-23 15:33 ---
Fixed.
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|
--- Comment #8 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-12-10 08:40 ---
*** Bug 34256 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-31
19:18 ---
*** Bug 23660 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-08-31 20:34
---
In the discussion on the duplicate PR 23660, rth explained part of this here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-08/msg00934.html
W.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22076
--
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO||22152
nThis||
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22076
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-22
20:27 ---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Additional Comments From uros at kss-loka dot si 2005-06-21 12:04
---
New testcase (everything is initialized this time):
--cut here--
#include mmintrin.h
__v8qi test ()
{
__v8qi mm0 = {1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8};
__v8qi mm1 = {11,22,33,44,55,66,77,88};
volatile __m64 x;
x =
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-21
13:06 ---
I think this is more related to PR 14552 which was shown by me that we
regressed because we did not
output emms at all before so not emmiting mmx instructions without use of the
functions in
mmintrin.h
--- Additional Comments From falk at debian dot org 2005-06-15 12:56
---
(In reply to comment #0)
This testcase:
#include mmintrin.h
__m64 test() {
__m64 a;
return a;
}
Well, this is invalid code, so it's not really important what the code
looks like. If it also occurs
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-15
17:35 ---
a is uninitialized so what do you expect?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22076
14 matches
Mail list logo
