--- Comment #11 from bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-11 15:41
---
Created an attachment (id=9967)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9967&action=view)
reduced testcase
reduced testcase, but with uninitialized variables. top of tree:
2005-09-29 Paolo Bonzini
--- Comment #10 from bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-11 11:38
---
This is as small as I could make it. Any other attempt to hoist something
causes it not to fail anymore (at -maltivec -O2). Interesting, given that GCSE
*does* the hoisting...
It's a reload problem.
typedef _
--- Comment #9 from bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-07 07:19 ---
I'm looking at it.
--
bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from janis187 at us dot ibm dot com 2005-10-06 20:17 ---
A regression hunt on powerpc-linux using the testcase from comment #6
identified this patch from rth:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2005-08/msg01004.html
--
janis187 at us dot ibm dot com changed:
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-06 16:49 ---
I am going to say this is 4.1 regression. We are not legitimizing the memory
address for some reason.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
